GMS and PartnersGMS and PartnersGMS and PartnersGMS and Partners
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Publications
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact

How to structure into Cambodia and Vietnam

    Home News How to structure into Cambodia and Vietnam
    NextPrevious

    How to structure into Cambodia and Vietnam

    By sonlt | News | Comments are Closed | 10 October, 2015 | 0

    An increase in the number of overseas investments by Korean companies is leading to more transactions between Korean companies and their overseas subsidiaries. Korean companies are increasingly looking to minimize the tax burden on their international investments and this article examines the tax issues of two real examples where a Korean company has invested in real estate projects in Vietnam and Cambodia. Specifically, the examples investigate the choice that the parent company has between i) a credit and a deduction for taxes paid overseas, and ii) the decision of a contract for an international project.

    Korean tax laws provide for relief against international double taxation through a foreign tax credit or foreign tax deduction on foreign taxes paid by resident taxpayers on foreign sourced income. In accordance with Article 57.1 of the Corporate Tax Act, Article 104.6 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act and any applicable tax treaty, a Korean company may select the method by which foreign taxes are deducted from its corporate tax amount. It may also select the method by which foreign taxes are included in deductible expenses in calculating its taxable income. (For a company or trust established in accordance with the Indirect Investment Asset Management Act or the Real Estate Investment Company Act, ordinary tax credit shall be calculated according to Article 57.2 of the Corporate Tax Act. However, when indirect tax credit is involved, Article 104.6 of the Restriction Act is still applicable.)

    A taxpayer can switch methods each fiscal year. In general, foreign tax credit has more advantages than the deduction method, which indirectly affects the amount of taxation. However, the percentage of foreign sourced income is capped under the tax credit method, which can skew results.

    In the example above, Korean Company X has a subsidiary, Company Y in Cambodia and is seeking to minimise its overall tax payments. Cambodia’s corporate tax rate is 20% and the withholding tax rate on dividends is 14%. Company Y will pay the entire available amount for dividends.

    It is clear in scenario one that tax deduction method is more advantageous than tax credit. However, in scenario two, where X sustained a loss in fiscal year one, X will carry forward W21.2 million for a future tax credit up to five years under the tax credit method, or it will carry forward the deficit amount of ? 41.2 (?20 – 21.2) up to five years under the tax deduction method.

    In year two, X cannot make use of its the W21 million carried forward because there will be a separate tax credit applied in fiscal year two, which exceeds the tax credit limit. However, the deficit carried forward can be fully deducted from the tax base for fiscal year two. Taking the tax deduction route in fiscal year one and the tax credit route in fiscal year two therefore delivers the best results.

    The entire tax payment of a parent company and its subsidiaries can also vary depending on which entity is used as a contractor for a foreign business project. Taking the following example, Korean construction firm, Company A, owns a Korean subordinate, Company X, which is a main subcontractor of Company A and which will perform a contract for a construction project in Vietnam. Companies A and X each have a foreign subsidiary in Vietnam, Subsidiaries B and Y, respectively. To perform this project, A can be a contractor with two options: A gives an order to X and X subcontracts the order to Subsidiary Y (Case one), or A gives an order directly to Subsidiary Y (Case two). On the other hand, Subsidiary B can be a contractor with different options: B gives an order to X and X subcontracts the order to Subsidiary Y (Case three), or B gives an order directly to Y (Case four).

    Before reviewing the example, it is necessary to examine the tax laws of both countries and the tax treaty between Korea and Vietnam. First, since the tax treaty between Korea and Vietnam does not allow an indirect tax credit, Article 104.6 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act is applicable. Second, when X pays dividends to A, Article 18.3 of the Corporate Tax Act is applicable. (This provision is to prevent double taxation on dividends between Korean companies. To compare the four cases, A is assumed to own 100 percent of the outstanding stocks of X, which result in the exclusion of dividends from A’s taxable income.) Vietnam’s corporate tax rate is 28% and since 2004 foreign investors have no longer been subject to remittance tax when transferring their profits out of Vietnam. B and Y will pay the entire available amount for dividends.

    On a general level, it would be simple to conclude that the more income is generated in Vietnam, the higher the tax liability. Therefore, to minimise the overall tax liability, it is advantageous for a company to be a contractor located in a country with a low effective tax rate.

    However, it is important to pay attention to other issues. First, in Vietnam, Foreign Contractor withholding tax can be imposed if applicable (foreign entities will be subject to the Foreign Contractor withholding tax even though they are not physically present in Vietnam). Second, if the duration of a construction project is more than six months, it can be regarded as a permanent establishment and subject to taxation of that country, with a resulting higher tax burden.

    In conclusion, although the foreign tax credit route is more advantageous than the tax deduction route, the latter should not be written off.

    This article was originally published in Asialaw.

    No tags.

    sonlt

    More posts by sonlt

    Related Post

    • Google employee dies in an accident at the Cannes Lions advertising festival

      By sonlt | 0 comment
      You may purchase phone plans with more than enough data to cover things like casual web surfing and streaming the occasional song. But you may not realize that browsing Facebook could be a big hitRead more

    • This CEO is taking on the biggest banks on Wall Street — and winning

      By sonlt | 5 comments
      You may purchase phone plans with more than enough data to cover things like casual web surfing and streaming the occasional song. But you may not realize that browsing Facebook could be a big hitRead more

    • How E-Commerce Is Finally Disrupting The $600 Billion-A-Year Grocery Industry

      By sonlt | 0 comment

      You may purchase phone plans with more than enough data to cover things like casual web surfing and streaming the occasional song. But you may not realize that browsing Facebook could be a big hitRead more

    • People Are Tweeting Their Rage At Scalia – But They're Making One Crucial Mistake

      By sonlt | 0 comment
      You may purchase phone plans with more than enough data to cover things like casual web surfing and streaming the occasional song. But you may not realize that browsing Facebook could be a big hitRead more

    • How a tweet turned Uber’s first hire into a millionaire

      By sonlt | 0 comment

      You may purchase phone plans with more than enough data to cover things like casual web surfing and streaming the occasional song. But you may not realize that browsing Facebook could be a big hitRead more

    • Making Market Noise: M&A in Vietnam

      By sonlt | Comments are Closed

      Vietnam has seen an increase in M&A activity in recent years as investors view an emerging investment channel for companies both within and outside of Vietnam.   In accordance with the Government’s restructuring plan for strengtheningRead more

    • Beyond Bottlenecks: Attracting International Investment in Vietnam’s Infrastructure Secto

      By sonlt | Comments are Closed

      Beyond Bottlenecks: Attracting International Investment in Vietnam’s Infrastructure Sector Introduction Over the past decade Vietnam has made spectacular progress in GDP growth and poverty reduction. Annual per capita growth has averaged 5.9 percent, the eighthRead more

    • Listing Offshore: Why don’t Vietnamese companies seek greener pastures?

      By sonlt | Comments are Closed

      When Vingroup announced its plan to list on Singapore’s Stock Exchange (SGX) in 2014, it was considered that such a listing would pave the way for local companies to quickly follow suit; especially, as VietnamRead more

    NextPrevious

    HCMC OFFICE

    Suite 1.4, Level 1, Packsimex Bldg.
    52 Dong Du Street, District 1,
    Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    P: +84-90-798-8855
    E: info@gmspartners.asia

    PHNOM PENH OFFICE

    #40D, Street 352
    Beoung Keng Kang 1, Chamkamorn,
    Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
    P: +84-90-798-8855
    E: info@gmspartners.asia

    ABOUT US

    GMS is an integrated and independent organization, specializing in management consulting, corporate advisory, business advisory, and acquisition services in the ASEAN region.

    SERVICES

    • Business Advisory
    • Corporate Advisory
    • Financial Advisory
    • Acquisitions
    • Home
    • About
    • Services
    • Publications
    • News
    • Blog
    • Contact
    Copyright 2015 by GMS Partners | All Rights SơnWeb
    • About
    • Blog
    • Contact
    • Home page
    • Publications
    • Services
    GMS and Partners